Thursday, 5 December 2013

Political Donations- A tool to convert Black Money into White.

FOR BETTER VIEW OF ARTICLE PLZ CLICK BELOW LINKhttps://www.dropbox.com/s/p3blmzl6wcxryo1/Political%20Donation%20%28Animesh%20singi%29.pdf

Truth behind Political Donations!!

Hello friends finally after finishing my CA final exams I am again here to serve you some interesting things regarding our field.
Introduction
As all of us know that we have just went through from a Political month and voted recently in elections 2013 but the biggest question arises in our mind that How Political Party funded? How they arrange such a long Rallies & Functions? How they are financed? Few days before one of the political party AAP raises the same issue by declaring all of its sources of donations, but still there is lacuna in transparency of donations received by other political parties. Let’s come to the point in this blog I am raising curtains from this issue & putting in front of you all the background activities behind these donations. The public has no idea about where three-fourths of the funding of political parties comes from.
Political parties rely heavily on donations for fighting elections and running their daily affairs. They receive huge sums of money in the form of donations and contributions from corporate, trusts and individuals.
Relevant provisions under Indian laws for Political party’s Donations and Contribution:
Ø  Section 29C of the Representation of People Act, 1951 says that political parties are required to submit contribution details received in excess of Rs 20,000 from any person or a company.
Ø  Section 293A of Company’s Act, 1956 states that no Government company and no other company which has been in existence for less than 3 years, shall contribute any amount to any political party or for any political purpose to any person. They can only donate up to 5% of its profit in a year, and the company is bound to disclose the amount in its profit and loss account. This exercise should be conducted with the approval of its board of directors through a resolution. political parties cannot receive contributions from government companies.
Ø  Any contribution made by an individual/Company to a political party is fully deductible under section 80GGC/80GGB of the Income Tax Act 1961.
Ø  As per section 13A of the I.T Act, any income of a political party which is chargeable under the head "Income from house property" or "Income from other sources" or “any income by way of voluntary contributions” received by a political party from any person shall not be included in the total income of such political party if they:
 (a) keeps and maintains such books of account and other documents
 (b) in respect of each such voluntary contribution in excess of twenty thousand rupees, such political party keeps and maintains a record of such contribution and the name and address of the person who has made such contribution.
Under Sections 3 & 4 of Foreign Contributions (Regulation) Act (FCRA), 1976, political parties are not permitted to accept contributions from foreign companies or companies controlled in India by foreign companies.
How Black money is routed through Electoral Trust?
Donating money to political parties first started in Germany. In India, it was first adopted by the Tatas, who floated their electoral trust in 1996. It was followed up by the Birla’s a few years later. Since then money from these companies have been routed through this trust, as they felt this was a good way to participate in the electoral process.



The Budget 2009-10 proposed to provide 100% tax exemption to electoral trusts. The only caveat is that the trust uses or distributes at least 95% of its income from such sources for the objective it was set up for. It is yet another stimulus for making white out of black money in an economy of forgone taxes. And friends, it is an American system directly imported. US economy turned corporate imperialist as corporates fund US political system. All money is white there, black. Money made from prostitution, drug network, mafia activities are also pumped into the democracy. Another issue is that of allowing anonymous donations. The current limit of Rs 20,000 on anonymous cash transactions is routinely bypassed by the donation of multiple smaller sums. The channels of real estate companies, education and religious trusts, which deal with large-scale cash transactions, are known to be used to route anonymous donations.
Now I am coming to main point that how political parties funded.
Very first benefit given to Political parties is by introducing Section 13A since 1978. As per provisions of this section income of Registered political party is exempted except Income from Business/Profession subject to few conditions like maintaining proper accounts, accounts should be duly audited, for voluntary contribution above Rs.20000 records of name and address of contributor should be maintained. This is the short summary of provision by Fig. 1.1.           




Problem faced by Political Parties in section 13A: In above section there is good relief to political party, but still they are missing something more than they actually get i.e. many corporate tax payers are feared to donate money to political party because of there name disclosure in public due to c) condition in section 13A. Due to above section political parties are obliged to disclose name of all donators who are contributing amount exceeding Rs.20000 which they really don’t want to disclose because many of the corporates route there black money in cash to political parties.

Solution made by Government for them: For solving this problem of political party government introduced new section-13B vide Finance Act 2010 which introduces concept of Electoral Trust. As per provisions of this section Any Voluntary contribution received by Approved electoral trust is exempt if it distributes 95% of the aggregate donation received during the year along with any surplus brought forward from earlier previous year. It means now electoral trust is not require to maintain any records like name & address of person contributing so corporates doner who are giving there black money as a donation also gets relief & political party is also get funded by the 95% amount distributed by the Electoral trust. Lets summaries the Scenario by the given below diagram how Black money introduces silently as donation without disclosing name of donor.



Benefits derived from provisions
Donor
Electoral Trust
Political Party
Black Money Transferred easily.
Income Exempt, No taxation
Income Exempt, No Taxation.
No disclosure of contributor in public because E.T. not requires maintaining records for voluntary contributions.
No need to maintain records of donors. It can record any amount of donation on anybody’s name.
Easily financed by 95% of Black money received from E.T. for spending money on rallies & functions.
Received Political support in various government projects like Coal, mining, power etc due to huge donations to ruling party.
Political parties may Transfer there own black money to E.T. in cash without disclosing its name.
No need to maintain records of various contributors, It requires only to record name of E.T. who distributes 95% of aggregate donations to the Political Party
Evidences Supporting above methodology:
1). The total funds received by six national political parties between 2004-2005 and 2011-2012 was Rs 4,895.96 crore of which only 8.9% was from known donors. Around Rs 3,674.50 crore or 75.5% were anonymous contributions.
2). Congress tops the parties for the largest amount (Rs 1,951.07 crore or 82.5%) in anonymous donations & BJP 73%, BSP 61.8%.
3). Congress accepted 90.38% of its total funds between 2008 and 2012 in cash and only 9.62% were in cheque. Over 67% of BJP's total funds were in cash while 83% of NCP's were in cash. Due to these cash donations it becomes all the more difficult to establish the identity of the donor.
4). Top Donors to Electoral Trust:
Party
Top Donars
Amount (In Lakhs)
INC
General Electoral Trust
3641
Torrent Power Ltd
1415
Bharti Electoral Trust
1100
BJP
General Electoral Trust
2657
Public & Political Awareness Trust
1450
Torrent Power Ltd
1300

5). Records of donors who are contributing more than Rs.20000.

Financial Year-2010-2011
Party
INC
BJP
BSP
CPM
NCP
CPI
Total Income in FY 2010-2011 (In Lakhs)
30,708.87
16,800.92
11,570.34
7,657.00
2,330.59
212.23
Total contribution/donations (In Lakhs)
1,582.56
12,446.00
7,138.00
2,414.17
14.34
113.86
% of donations from income
5.15%
74.08%
61.69%
31.53%
0.62%
53.65%
Amount received as contribution in sums greater than 20,000 (lakhs)
802.05
1,462.53
0
153.57
13.55
108.11
No. of Donors contributing more than Rs.20,000 (as reported by the party)
417
502
0
69
9
47
% of Contributions received in sums greater than Rs. 20,000
50.68%
11.75%
0%
6.36%
94.49%
94.95%



(All the above facts are supported by reports of Association of domestic reforms)      
Who donates them?
According to a report recently released by the Association for Democratic Reforms, private companies have contributed immensely to the coffers of the Congress as well as the BJP. This political party provides benefits to these companies during there ruling period & receives huge donations in lieu of it. Mainly report discloses that they receive donations from companies who have been allotted coal blocks. These are the figures disclosed from that report:
a).Jindal Steel and Power Ltd (JSPL), which has been allocated as many as 12 coal blocks, donated 
Rs.1.05 crore to the Congress.
b).Sterlite Energy Ltd, which was given a coal block in Orissa in 2008, donated 
Rs.1 crore to the Congress in 2004-05 and Rs.5 crore in 2009-10. c).Firms associated with the Adani Group are said to have donated Rs.2.5 crore to the Congress and Rs.2.75 crore to the BJP between 2004-05 and 2009-10.
d).Tata Sons, whose entities like Tata Steel, Tata Power and Tata Sponge Iron have been allocated four coal blocks also made handsome donations through the Electoral Trust which it established in 1996. Hindalco Industries is one of the biggest donors to political parties through its general electoral trust. The other major donor to political parties is the electoral trust established by the Tatas, which has donated Rs 9.79 crore. The Congress was given Rs 5.64 crore while the BJP got Rs 4.14 crore. The CAG on the coal scam had named Tata Power as one of the beneficiaries in the coal scam.
e).According to the National Election Watch and the Association for Democratic Reforms, the other trusts and companies which have made contributions to the political parties include the Bharti Electoral Trust, ITC Limited, Asianet TV Holding Pvt. Ltd., Ambuja Cement Ltd., Harmony Electoral Trust, Mahindra and Mahindra and Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Most of the parties are financed by Electoral Trust.
f).Both INC and BJP amounting to Rs 983.50 lakhs and 1,942.50 lakhs respectively received foreign funding between FY 2003-04 and 2011-12. Such donors include the Vedanta group (Sesa Goa, The Madras Aluminium Co. Ltd, Sterlite Industries), Public and Political Awareness Trust of Vedanta, Hyatt Regency (an Americal International company) and Dow Chemicals (headquartered in Michigan, USA)
g).Vedanta group is the top donor to both the parties with its subsidiary, Sterlite Industries donating Rs 600 lakhs followed by Sesa Goa Ltd donating Rs 2,78.50 lakhs to INC

Conclusion:
Our democratic country has recently passed RTI to bring little transparency to trace beauroucracy but we are in need to take some steps for this. Let’s see winning party will do anything regarding it or not. Only five regional parties have regularly filed their contribution reports from 2004-05 to 2010-11 to the EC. Eighteen regional parties have never submitted their contribution reports. Disallowing anonymous donations or taxing them is an idea that should be seriously considered. It becomes all the more important to have a strict regulatory mechanism wherein political parties have to report the correct quantum and the source of donations received.

If i have done any mistake in applying my concepts than please comment it in blog.

Tuesday, 30 April 2013

Amendments made in Finance Bill 2013 (Passed in Parliament)

Existing Position
Position as amended by the Lok Sabha
Finaly after a few debate in parliament house Finance Bill 2013 passed by parliament yesterday with slight amendments. Here is the list of amendments summarized in comparison with previous act.Lets have a look at it !!!
 
 
 
 
 
Scope of Sec. 10(48) widened to include other prescribed income also and not just income arising from sale of crude oil
The Finance Act 2012 inserted a new clause (48) in Section 10 to provide for exemption in respect of any income received in India in Indian currency by a foreign company on account of sale of crude oil in any period in India, if a few conditions are satisfied.
The Finance Bill, 2013 as passed by the Lok Sabha (herein after referred to as 'the Finance Bill, 2013') enlarges the scope of Section 10(48). With effect from the assessment year 2014-15, the exemption will also be available in respect of income arising on account of sale of any other goods or rendering of services as notified by the Central Government.
Trading in commodity derivatives no more a speculative transaction
Proviso to Section 43(5) provides a list of transactions which shall not be deemed to be 'speculative' transactions.
A new clause (e) is inserted in proviso to Section 43(5) wef assessment year 2014-15 to provide that trading in commodity derivatives carried out in a recognised association shall not be treated as 'speculative' transaction. For this purpose, an eligible transaction means:
(a)  Any transaction carried out electronically on screen-based system through a member registered for trading in commodity derivatives under the FCRA;
(b)  Transaction is supported by a time stamped note issued by such member;
(c)  The contract note should indicate unique client identity number, unique trade number and PAN.
TRC – Can be a conclusive evidence but has to be supported by prescribed documents
(1)  The Finance Act, 2012 imposed a mandatory condition to furnish Tax Residency Certificate ('TRC') for availing of benefits under the DTAAs. The TRC helps in establishing the country of residence of a non-resident taxpayer.
Considering these apprehensions of the taxpayers, the provision proposed by the Finance Bill, 2013 that TRC was a necessary but not a sufficient condition for claiming benefit under DTAA has been removed.
(2)  However, the Finance Bill, 2013 had amended section 90 to provide that submission of TRC was a necessary but not a sufficient condition for claiming benefits under DTAA. This amendment was proposed to be introduced retrospectively wef AY 2013-14.
As per the amended version, apart from the submission of a TRC (which is a necessary condition), the assessee shall also provide such other documents and information as may be prescribed for claiming benefits under the DTAAs.
(3)  This proposed amendments raised apprehensions among the taxpayers that it would give powers to the tax collectors to disregard the TRC and view the transaction independently.
Time-limit for completion of an assessment when reference is made to the TPO
Sections 153 and 153B, inter-alia, provide the time-limit for completion of an assessment and re-assessment. These time-limits get extended if a reference is made under Section 92CA to the TPO. These time-limits were extended by Finance Act, 2012 by 3 months wef July 1, 2012.
The Finance Bill, 2013 provides that the revised time-limit will be applicable regardless of the fact whether:
(a)  A reference to TPO is made before, on or after July 1, 2012; or
(b)  The order of TPO is passed before, on or after July 1, 2012.
TAN not required to deduct tax from payment made for purchasing an immovable property
A new section 194-IA is inserted by the Finance Bill, 2013 to provide that transferee is liable to deduct tax at source at 1% from payment being made to a resident-transferor in respect of purchase of an immovable property.
The Finance Bill, 2013 approved of the provisions of Section 194-IA. However, it provided an exemption to the transferee from obtaining a TAN, which is otherwise a mandatory requirement for deduction of tax at source.
Concessional withholding rates on certain rupee denominated long-term infrastructure bonds is withdrawn
The Finance Bill, 2013 proposed to introduce a provision wherein even Indian Rupee loan given by non-resident through the route of Long-term Infrastructure Bonds would also enjoy the concessional rate of tax deduction at source.
This amendment has been withdrawn in the Finance Bill, 2013. However, a new provision is inserted in Section 194LD which provides as under:
(1)  Tax under this section shall be deducted in respect of interest on a rupee denominated bond of an India company or Government security which is payable after May 31, 2013 but before June 1, 2015;
(2)  Tax at concessional rate shall be deducted if payment is made to a FII or a qualified foreign investor;
(3)  Tax to be deducted at 5%;
(4)  If tax is deducted under Sec. 194LD, provisions of Sections 195 and 196D will not be applicable.
Non-resident referred to in Section 194LC will not be penalised for not having a PAN
By virtue of Section 206AA, if PAN of the recipient is not available, tax is deductible either at the normal rate or at the rate of 20%, whichever is higher.
Under the amended provisions of Section 206AA, in respect of payment of interest on long-term infrastructure bonds to a non-resident (as referred to in Section 194LC), tax will be deducted at the normal rate of 5%, even if the non-resident-recipient does not have PAN.
Even gold coins weighing less than 10 gms will be subject to TCS
Sale of bullion/jewellery is subject to TCS provisions in following cases:
With effect from June 1, 2013, consideration of any coin or any other article weighing 10 grams or less shall not be excluded while calculating the monetary limit of Rs. 2,00,000.
(1)  If the sale consideration of bullion (excluding any coin/article weighing 10 grams or less) exceeds Rs. 2,00,000; or
(2)  If the sale consideration of jewellery exceeds Rs. 5,00,000 and out of sale consideration any amount is received in cash.
No wealth-tax on agriculture land
The urban land is not chargeable to wealth-tax if it is a land:
Land classified as agricultural land in the records of the Government and used for agricultural purposes, will not be treated as an 'asset' under Section 2(ea) with retrospective effect from the AY 1993-94. Consequently, such land will not be chargeable to wealth-tax, even if such land is situated in an urban area.
(1)  On which construction of a building is not permissible under any law for the time being in force in the area in which such land is situated; or
As per the amended provision, following lands will not be chargeable to wealth-tax:
(2)  occupied by any building which has been constructed with the approval of the appropriate authority; or
(1) Land classified as agricultural land in the records of the Government and used for agricultural purposes; or
(3)  being an unused land held by the assessee for industrial purposes for a period of two years from the date of its acquisition by him; or
(2) Land on which construction of a building is not permissible under any law for the time being in force in the area in which such land is situated; or
(4)  held by the assessee as stock-in-trade for a period of 10 years from the date of its acquisition by him.
(3) Land occupied by any building which has been constructed with the approval of the appropriate authority; or
(4) An unused land held by the assessee for industrial purposes for a period of two years from the date of its acquisition by him; or
(5) Land held by the assessee as stock-in-trade for a period of 10 years from the date of its acquisition by him.